A screening approach for aquaculture breeders based on sperm performance under climate change-related stress
Thales S. França, Wendy A. González-López, Fátima Fernández-García, Laís P. Borges, Álvaro Belenguer, Paul G. Holhorea, Josep A. Calduch-Giner, Luz Pérez, Alicia Felip, Evaristo L. Mañanós, Ana Gómez, Neil Duncan, Jaume Pérez-Sánchez, Juan F. Asturiano
Abstract
We aimed
to develop a screening approach to differentiate among males of European sea
bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata),
and Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) based on sperm performance
under environmental acidification and temperature increase. Sperm samples were
selected using a CASA system, and three challenge tests were applied. The first
one consisted of sperm activation with artificial seawater (ASW) across a pH
range (7.6–8.2). The second assessed activation at species-specific
temperatures. The third test evaluated the combined effect of ASW pH (7.8 and 8.2)
and different temperatures. Results from the third challenge test revealed
differences in sperm performance under environmental variations, allowing
differentiation among males. For this purpose, sperm motility values obtained
for each sample under species-specific natural environmental conditions were
used as references, and variations in motility were compared across challenge
conditions. Different levels in the criteria (regarding the different
percentages of motility variation) were applied to differentiate among males. The
temperature increase affected the sperm kinetic parameters of European sea bass
and Senegalese sole, while gilthead seabream sperm showed lower variation under
seawater acidification and rising temperatures. The challenge test allowed
differentiation among males based on sperm performance under environmental
variations and represents a preliminary screening approach. However, these
results are based on in vitro conditions and should be interpreted as a first
proxy, requiring further validation to establish links with reproductive
performance in vivo.
Aquaculture
Reports, 48: 103672. 2026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2026.103672
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Nota: solo los miembros de este blog pueden publicar comentarios.